Remote Service Available Nationwide

  1. Intake & Documentation Review

  2. Pattern & Behavior Analysis

  3. Independent finding Report

  4. Optional Clarification Call

Our Review Process

  1. No duplication of adjuster work: We complement, never replace the initial claim review

  2. Fraud-focused methodology: Every service is built to uncover fraud exposure, inconsistencies, and indicators, not simply restate facts

  3. Actionable intelligence: Our reports are structured for clarity, defensibility, and immediate use in carrier and SIU decision making

  4. Human-led expertise, not automation

our differences
our differences

The CAG Differences

  • Clarity without disruption: We enhance insight without changing your workflow.

  • Neutral: No advocacy for closure or escalation.

  • Defensible: Evidence-based investigations with clear documentation.

  • No Integration: We work outside your systems no IT onboarding, no platform access, no credentials required.

  • Responsive: Inquiries answered within one business day; urgent reviews scheduled same day when possible.

  • Independent: We provide structured investigative insight only—no claim adjusting, coverage decisions, or PI services. All data comes from public, legally accessible sources.

Our Approach

black and white round analog wall clock at 10 10
black and white round analog wall clock at 10 10

Turnaround times

  • Verification Insights Review:

  • 24-48 hours

  • Travel Claim Fraud Review:

  • 24 hours - 3 days

  • Fraud Indicator Review:

  • 3-6 days

  • Expedited investigation available upon request

Use Cases

Fraud Indicator Review

Common Scenarios

  • Contradictory statements

  • Conflicting documents

  • Suspicious medical bills

  • Staged-loss indicators

  • Documentation inconsistencies

  • Provider red flags

  • High-exposure or sensitive claim

Travel Claim Review

Common Scenarios

  • Unverifiable itineraries

  • Altered receipts

  • Late-document submissions

  • Multiple trips in short timeframe

  • Patterns of repeat claims

  • Screenshots

  • PNG or JPEG photos

  • No identification or lost identification

Verification Insight Review

Ideal For:

  • Mild discomfort but no clear red flags

  • Inconsistent FNOL details

  • Behavioral indicators

  • Need to determine if escalation is warranted

Claim Defensibility Review

Claim quality reviews designed to assess whether a file has been investigated thoroughly, documented clearly, and supported in a way that can withstand internal scrutiny, regulatory review, or legal challenge.

Tel: 713-487-7297

Email: contact@claimanalysisgroup.com

Address: 11811 North Freeway, Suite 222,

Houston, TX 77060

© 2026 Claim Analysis Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.